2026-04-09
This application note describes the use of the Wayeal ion chromatography system for the determination of guanidinoacetic acid and related impurities in feed additives. The primary function of feed additives is to enhance feed performance and increase livestock production efficiency by means of trace-level supplementation.
The composition of feed additives is subject to extremely strict control to ensure safety, efficacy, and regulatory compliance. They must be added in strict accordance with established standards, with precise proportions based on product instructions and animal nutritional requirements. Excessive addition may lead to toxicity, while insufficient addition renders them ineffective. The illegal addition of any substances is strictly prohibited.
According to the Regulations on the Administration of Feeds and Feed Additives, the direct addition of hormones, unapproved chemical substances, and veterinary drug raw materials is strictly prohibited. Quality control of feed is ensured through the testing of both raw materials and finished products. Accurate content determination provides technical data support for enterprises.
Keywords: Ion chromatography, UV detector, Feed additives.
1. Instrument and Reagents
1.1 Ion Chromatograph Configuration List
Table 1 Instrument Configuration List
|
No. |
Modular |
Qty |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | IC6200 Series Ion Chromatography System with UV Detector | 1 |
| 2 | AS3100 Autosampler | 1 |
| 3 | SmartLab CDS 2.0 Chromatography Workstation | 1 |
| 4 | MS-5C-P2, 4.6×250 mm | 1 |
1.2 Reagents and Standards
Table 2 Reagents and Standards List
|
No. |
Reagents / Standards |
Purity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guanidinoacetic Acid (GAA) Liquid Standards | 507.03 mg/L |
| 2 | Cyanamide Liquid Standards | 1081.29 mg/L |
| 3 | Dicyandiamide Liquid Standards | 1107.72 mg/L |
| 4 | Glycine Liquid Standards | 1344.10 mg/L |
1.3 Experiment Material and Auxiliary Equipment
Prefilled Syringe Filter, Hydrophilic, 0.45μm
Syringe (20mL)
2. Experiment Method
2.1 Sample Pretreatment
Accurately weigh 0.2g of the dried sample into a 250mL beaker. Add 100mL of ultrapure water and place the beaker in an ultrasonic bath for 30 minutes. Repeat this extraction procedure 3 to 4 times. Quantitatively transfer the combined extract into a 1000mL volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with ultrapure water, and mix thoroughly. The prepared sample solution is then used both without dilution and after a 10-fold dilution. An appropriate portion of each solution is filtered through a 0.22μm membrane filter before being injected into the instrument for analysis.
2.2 Experiment Condition
Table 3 Chromatographic Condition
| Chromatographic Column | MS-5C-P2, 4.6 × 250 mm |
| Eluent | 8–35 mM MSA gradient elution |
| Flow Rate | 1mL/min |
| Run Time | 60min |
| Injection Volume | 10μL |
| Column Temperature | 40 °C |
| Cell Temperature | 45 °C |
| Wavelength | 200nm |
3. Experiment Result
3.1 Standards Chromatogram
The aanalysis is completed within 60 minutes, demonstrating good linearity and excellent linear repeatability. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) are excellent, and sample repeatability is satisfactory, meeting the testing requirements.
![]()
Fig1 Overlaid Chromatograms of Calibration Standards
3.2 Linear Range
Appropriate volumes of the standard solutions were taken and diluted to construct calibration curves. The deviation of the linearity test results from the known concentrations was within the maximum permissible deviation. The correlation coefficient (R) was above 0.999 for all analytes, indicating excellent linearity.
Table 4 Linear Ranges for Each Analyte
|
Analyte |
Linear Range |
Correlation Coefficient (R) |
|---|---|---|
| Guanidinoacetic Acid | 10–100mg/L | 0.99994 |
| Cyanamide | 2.5–80mg/L | 0.99996 |
| Dicyandiamide | 0.1–1mg/L | 0.99919 |
| Glycine | 5–100mg/L | 1.00000 |
![]()
Fig 2 Linearity Results for Each Analyte
3.3 Linearity Repeatability Test
![]()
Fig 3 Overlaid Chromatograms of 8 Consecutive Injections of the Lowest Calibration Standard (S1) for Repeatability Test.
![]()
Fig 4 Overlaid Chromatograms of 8 Consecutive Injections of the Mid-Point Calibration Standard (S3) for Repeatability Test
![]()
Fig 5 Overlaid Chromatograms of 8 Consecutive Injections of the Highest Calibration Standard (S7) for Repeatability Test
Table 5 Calibration Curve Repeatability Test Data
|
Compound |
Calibration Point |
Retention Time(min) RSD (%) |
Peak Area (μS*s) RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guanidinoacetic Acid | S1 | 0.282 | 0.28 |
| S3 | 0.22 | 0.754 | |
| S6 | 0.284 | 0.28 | |
| Cyanamide | S1 | 0.268 | 0.143 |
| S3 | 0.257 | 0.046 | |
| S6 | 0.352 | 0.118 | |
| Dicyandiamide | S1 | 0.811 | 0.396 |
| S3 | 0.706 | 0.043 | |
| S6 | 0.906 | 0.027 | |
| Glycine | S1 | 0.221 | 0.263 |
| S3 | 0.171 | 0.101 | |
| S6 | 0.232 | 0.035 |
3.4 Limit of Detection (LOD) Test
![]()
Fig 6 hromatogram of the Detection Limit Test for Guanidinoacetic Acid
Table 6 Test Data for the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) of Guanidinoacetic Acid
|
Compound |
Concentration(mg/L) |
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (S/N) |
Peak Height (μS) |
Noise (μS) |
Theoretical LOD (mg/L) |
Theoretical LOQ (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guanidinoacetic Acid | 0.01 | 34.844 | 0.124 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
3.5 LOD and LOQ Test for Impurities
![]()
Fig 7 LOD and LOQ Test for Impurities
Table 7 LOD and LOQ Test Data for Impurities
|
Compound |
Concentration (mg/L) |
Signal-to-Noise Ratio |
Peak Height (μS) |
Noise (μS) |
Theoretical LOD (mg/L) |
Theoretical LOQ (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyanamide | 0.25 | 20.436 | 0.057 | 0.006 | 0.037 | 0.122 |
| Dicyandiamide | 0.05 | 74.434 | 0.206 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Glycine | 2 | 27.124 | 0.075 | 0.006 | 0.221 | 0.737 |
3.6 Chromatograms of Sample Content and Repeatability Test
![]()
Fig 8 Chromatograms of 8 Consecutive Injections of Undiluted Feed Additive Sample
Table 8 Test Data for Undiluted Feed Additive Sample
|
Sample Name |
Analyte |
Sample Weight (g) |
Final Volume (mL) |
Result (mg/L) |
Content (g/kg) |
Retention Time RSD (%) |
Peak Area (μS·s) RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed Additive | Cyanamide | 0.2 | 1000 | Not Detected | Not Detected | / | / |
| Dicyandiamide | 0.2 | 1000 | 0.099 | 0.495 | 0.397 | 0.44 | |
| Glycine | 0.2 | 1000 | Not Detected | Not Detected | / | / |
![]()
Fig 9 Chromatograms of 8 Consecutive Injections of the 10-Fold Diluted Feed Additive Sample
Table 9 Test Data for 10-Fold Diluted Feed Additive Sample
|
Sample Name |
Analyte |
Sample Weight (g) |
Final Volume (mL) |
Dilution Factor |
Result (mg/L) |
Content (g/kg) |
Retention Time RSD (%) |
Peak Area (μS·s) RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-Fold Diluted Feed Additive Sample | Guanidinoacetic Acid | 0.2 | 1000 | 10 | 18.61 | 930.5 | 0.083 | 0.637 |
4. Conclusion
In this study, a Wayeal ion chromatography system was used to determine the content of guanidinoacetic acid and related impurities in feed additives. This method enables accurate quantification of the target analytes in feed additives and can verify whether their addition complies with the Regulations on the Administration of Feeds and Feed Additives. By providing precise control over analyte content, this method offers technical data support for enterprises.
Send your inquiry directly to us