logo

Determination of 11 Triazine Pesticide Residues in Soil by HPLC

2026-07-23

Latest company case about Determination of 11 Triazine Pesticide Residues in Soil by HPLC
Case Detail

Triazine pesticides are organic compounds containing a triazine ring, used primarily as herbicides and insecticides in agriculture. Most triazine herbicides act by inhibiting the D1 protein in photosystem II (PSII), blocking the electron transport chain and preventing the synthesis of ATP and NADPH, which eventually causes weed death from "energy starvation". Newer triazine herbicides, such as indaziflam, target cellulose synthase to inhibit cell wall synthesis and restrict plant growth. Some triazine herbicides irritate skin and eyes; animal studies suggest carcinogenic and teratogenic risks, and long-term exposure may pose health hazards. Due to their long persistence in soil, these compounds can leach into or run off to water bodies, posing risks to aquatic ecosystems.

The analysis was performed on a WAYEAL LC3400 series HPLC system equipped with a UV detector, following the method specified in HJ 1052-2019. The 11 triazine pesticides were well separated, with resolutions exceeding 1.5. Six replicate injections of the 25 mg/L standard solution yielded RSDs for retention time below 0.18% and for peak area below 0.75%, demonstrating good instrument precision. All analytes exhibited linear correlation coefficients greater than 0.9999 within the tested range. When soil samples were spiked with 1.0mg/L of the standard, recoveries ranged from 82.16% to 90.61%, indicating acceptable method performance. No residues of the 11 triazine pesticides were detected in the soil sample tested.

Keywords:triazine pesticides; High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC); UV detection.

1. Instruments and Reagents

1.1 HPLC System Configuration

Table 1 Instrument Configuration

No.

Description

Unit

1

LC3400 Liquid Chromatography System

1

2

P3400B Binary High-pressure Pump

1

3

CT3400 Column Oven

1

4

AS3400 Autosample

1

5

UV3400 UV Detector

1

6

SmartLab CDS 2.0

1

1.2 Reagents and Standards List

Table 2 Reagents and Standards

No.

Reagents and Standards

Purity

1

Anhydrous Sodium Sulfate

Analytical Grade

2

Acetonitrile

HPLC Grade

3

11 Triazine Pesticides Mixed Standard Solution(500mg/L)

/

4

Acetone

Analytical Grade

5

Dichloromethane

Analytical Grade

6

n-Hexane

HPLC Grade

1.3 Chromatographic Conditions

Table 3 HPLC Operating Conditions

 Chromatographic Column

C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm)

Flow Rate

1.0 mL/min

Column Temperature

30°C

Mobile Phase

Mobile Phase A: Acetonitrile; Mobile Phase B: Water

Detection Wavelength

222nm

Injection Volume

10μL

1.4 Materials and Auxiliary Apparatus

Analytical Balance;

Ultrasonic Cleaner;

Vortex Mixer;

Rotary Evaporator;

2.Experimental Methods

2.1 Reagent Preparation

2.1.1 Mixed Working Standard Solution of 11 Triazine Pesticides

Precisely transfer 1.0 mL of the 11 triazine pesticides mixed standard solution (500 mg/L) into a 5 mL volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with acetonitrile, and shake well to obtain the mixed standard stock solution. Then, transfer appropriate volumes of the stock solution and dilute with acetonitrile to prepare a series of mixed working standard solutions at concentrations of 1.0, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, and 100.0 mg/L.

2.2 Sample Pretreatment 

2.2.1 Test Sample Solution

Carefully transfer 10 g of soil sample into a Soxhlet extraction thimble, and place the thimble into the siphon tube of the Soxhlet extractor. Add 200 mL of acetone-dichloromethane mixed solvent into the bottom flask and perform reflux extraction for 24 h at a reflux rate of 3–4 cycles per hour, then collect the extract.

Line a glass funnel with glass wool or a glass fiber filter membrane, add an appropriate amount of anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filter the extract into a concentrating flask. Rinse the extraction vessel and the funnel with 2–3 mL of acetone-dichloromethane mixed solvent, and combine the rinsates into the concentrating flask.

Concentrate the extract to approximately 0.5 mL, then add about 5 mL of n-hexane and concentrate again to about 1 mL to exchange the solvent to n-hexane for subsequent purification.

Mount the solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge onto the SPE manifold. Condition the cartridge sequentially with 5 mL of acetone and 10 mL of n-hexane, and do not allow the cartridge to dry. Before the solvent runs dry, transfer the concentrated extract (approximately 1 mL) onto the cartridge and begin collecting the eluate. Rinse the concentration vessel three times with 3 mL of n-hexane, transfer all rinsates onto the cartridge, and elute with 10 mL of acetone-n-hexane mixed solvent. Collect all eluate.

Concentrate the purified eluate to about 0.5 mL, add approximately 3 mL of acetonitrile, and concentrate again to about 0.5 mL to exchange the solvent to acetonitrile. Dilute to 1.0 mL with acetonitrile for analysis. Blank and spiked samples were prepared following the same procedure.

3.Experimental Results

3.1 System Suitability 

latest company case about [#aname#]

Fig.1 Chromatogram of 11 Triazine Pesticides Mixed Working Standard Solution

Table 4 Test Results of Mixed Working Standard Solution of 11 Triazine Pesticides 

Compound Name

Retention Time (min)

Theoretical Plate Number

Resolution

Simazine

19.107

16378

8.785

Atratone

24.953

18494

12.577

Simetryn

32.589

73665

2.777

Atrazine

33.873

93184

4.292

Secbumetone

35.698

123328

2.289

Prometone

36.620

134568

12.712

Ametryn

41.329

234193

1.933

Propazine

41.969

274152

5.606

Terbuthylazine

43.772

294960

11.671

 Prometryn

48.434

165222

3.377

Terbutryn

50.099

154810

n.a.

As shown in Fig. 1, the system suitability test results demonstrate well-defined peak shapes and baseline separation (resolution > 1.5) for all 11 triazine pesticides, with no interference from adjacent impurity peaks.

3.2 Precision

latest company case about [#aname#]

Fig.2: Overlaid Chromatograms of Six Consecutive Injections of The 11 Triazine Pesticides Mixed Working Standard Solution (25.0 mg/L)

Table 5 Precision Test Results for Six Consecutive Injections of the 11 Triazine Pesticides Mixed Working Standard Solution (25.0 mg/L).

Compound Name

RSD of Retention Time (%)

RSD of Peak Area (%)

Simazine

0.178

0.744

Atratone

0.177

0.327

Simetryn

0.090

0.577

Atrazine

0.085

0.508

Secbumetone

0.089

0.508

Prometone

0.079

0.437

Ametryn

0.057

0.563

Propazine

0.054

0.674

Terbuthylazine

0.042

0.540

 Prometryn

0.055

0.453

Terbutryn

0.058

0.444

The precision was evaluated by performing six consecutive injections of the mixed working standard solution at 25.0 mg/L. The RSD values of retention time were below 0.18%, and the RSD values of peak area were below 0.75%, indicating good instrument precision.

3.3 Linear Range

latest company case about [#aname#]

Fig.3 Chromatograms of Selected Triazine Pesticides for Calibration Curve

Table 6 Linearity Test Results for 11 Triazine Pesticides

Compound Name

Correlation Coefficient (R)

Simazine

0.99998

Atratone

0.99994

Simetryn

0.99995

Atrazine

0.99996

Secbumetone

0.99995

Prometone

0.99995

Ametryn

0.99996

Propazine

0.99995

Terbuthylazine

0.99995

 Prometryn

0.99995

Terbutryn

0.99992

Linearity results: Within the concentration range of 1.0–100.0 mg/L, the correlation coefficients of the mixed calibration curves for the 11 triazine compounds were all greater than 0.9999, showing satisfactory linearity.

3.4 Limit of Detection

latest company case about [#aname#]

Fig.4 Chromatogram of 11 Triazine Pesticides at 0.12 mg/L

Table 7 Test Results of 11 Triazine Pesticides at 0.12 mg/L

No.

Compound Name

Retention Time (min)

Peak Area (mAU・s)

Signal-to-Noise Ratio 

1

Simazine

19.142

6.593

25.651

2

Atratone

25.258

3.629

13.612

3

Simetryn

32.698

5.058

28.522

4

Atrazine

33.777

6.006

35.349

5

Secbumetone

35.904

4.903

28.219

6

Prometone

36.828

5.303

30.152

7

Ametryn

41.434

5.303

45.123

8

Propazine

41.933

6.345

49.666

9

Terbuthylazine

43.738

5.999

46.696

10

 Prometryn

48.590

6.620

31.775

11

Terbutryn

50.210

5.570

26.891

Note: According to the test data of 11 triazine pesticide standards (0.12 mg/L) in the above table, the limits of detection were calculated based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. The theoretical LOD values of the 11 triazine pesticides were 0.014, 0.026, 0.013, 0.010, 0.013, 0.012, 0.008, 0.007, 0.008, 0.011 and 0.013 mg/L, respectively.

3.5 Recovery

latest company case about [#aname#]

Fig.5 Overlaid Chromatograms for Recovery Test of 11 Triazine Pesticides

Table 8 Recovery Test Results of 11 Triazine Pesticides

Compound Name

Spiked Sample

Standards

Recovery(%)

Peak Area (mAUs)

Peak Area (mAUs)

Simazine

46.952

55.691

84.31

Atratone

45.498

54.222

83.91

Simetryn

53.168

62.416

85.18

Atrazine

51.781

63.023

82.16

Secbumetone

44.114

52.246

84.44

Prometone

44.802

52.885

84.72

Ametryn

49.022

59.522

82.36

Propazine

60.315

66.565

90.61

Terbuthylazine

48.505

57.702

84.06

Prometryn

52.919

59.818

88.47

Terbutryn

49.977

56.725

88.10

The recovery was evaluated by spiking soil samples with the mixed standard solution at 1.0 mg/L and analyzing them according to the procedure described above. The recoveries of the 11 triazine pesticides ranged from 82.16% to 90.61%, indicating satisfactory recovery performance.

3.6 Sample Analysis

6

Fig. 6. Chromatogram of the Soil Sample

No residues of the above 11 triazine pesticides were detected in the soil sample.

4.Conclusion

A method for the determination of 11 triazine pesticides in soil was developed following HJ 1052-2019, using a WAYEAL LC3400 series HPLC system with a UV detector. The 11 target analytes were well separated with resolutions greater than 1.5. The instrument precision was satisfactory, with RSDs below 0.18% for retention time and below 0.75% for peak area from six replicate injections of the 25.0 mg/L standard solution. Excellent linearity was achieved over the tested concentration range, with all correlation coefficients exceeding 0.9999. Recoveries at a spiking level of 1.0 mg/L in soil samples ranged from 82.16% to 90.61%. No detectable residues of the 11 triazine pesticides were found in the soil sample analyzed.